Meriter Master Limited Data Set DUA
This Master Limited Data Set DUA is to compliantly receive a Limited Data Set from Meriter. It must be combined with an approved Attachment 1.
File: UW-Meriter-LDS-Master-Agreement-FX.pdfThis Master Limited Data Set DUA is to compliantly receive a Limited Data Set from Meriter. It must be combined with an approved Attachment 1.
File: UW-Meriter-LDS-Master-Agreement-FX.pdfUse this form when requesting a Limited Data Set from Meriter.
File: MASTER-2025.7.14-LDS-DUA-ATTACHMENT-1web-1.docxOnly a few select individuals are authorized to sign contracts on behalf of the UW. This is due to the UW’s status as a state agency. Any contract or agreement that binds the UW to a legal or financial obligation requires an official UW signature to be valid.
The actual title of the document is not important, as a “contract,” an “agreement” or a “memorandum of understanding” each have the potential to legally obligate the university to undertake certain actions or pay certain amounts. Therefore, it is important that the terms of the contract are reviewed, approved, and routed to the proper signature authority. By submitting a contract through the proper channels (RAMP, Shop UW, etc.), your agreement will be routed to the correct signature authority once review and negotiations are completed.
IMPORTANT (if asked to sign please decline): If you receive a contract that asks for your individual signature, do not sign without consulting the SMPH Contracts Team. This often occurs when you are providing in-house consulting (i.e. consulting as part of your UW appointment). These agreements are signed by the SMPH CFO.
For more information on signature authority, see the most recent Memorandum published September 2024:
Signature authority may be updated from time to time. This document is for reference purposes only.
The School of Medicine and Public Health generates large volumes of data through our bench and human subjects research. The exchange of such data allows for broader insights by tapping into larger and broader population pools, which in turn results in more reliable and meaningful research outcomes. It may also help prevent duplication of efforts, and allow for greater collaborative comparisons of data. SMPH facilitates such transfers in a way that complies with federal law and UW policy, which include HIPAA (which applies to Protected Health Information), and our UW-Madison Policy of Data Stewardship, Access, and Retention.
Data Transfer and Use Agreements (DTUAs) are contracts used to govern how data can be shared between parties. These agreements include provisions to address various legal requirements imposed by federal law, and also outline limitations that protect the provider of the data. SMPH uses the Federal Demonstration Partnership (FDP) Agreement, which was designed to increase consistency in the terms and format of DTUAs, and to simplify negotiation between research institutions. The FDP templates allow for the sharing of multiple types of data, and for sharing with one or more parties. Additionally, depending on the nature of the data and the recipients involved, compliance with international and national regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) may also be required.
An agreement should be used when transferring data to a third party. This could be done through an existing agreement, such as the funding agreement, or through a separate DTUA. Campus policy dictates the need for such an agreement.
Federal law may require the use of a data agreement, such as when Protected Health Information (PHI) is disclosed to a third party. When PHI is disclosed, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compels us to follow certain requirements in sharing that data, including having an agreement in place that imposes certain obligations before the data is shared. Failure to comply with HIPAA may result in penalties to the UW and its employees.
If data was gathered from a human subjects study, the study team should review the IRB protocol to confirm whether the application allows for the disclosure of such data with the anticipated recipient. The study team should consult with the Health Sciences IRB for clarity on this matter. If a change of protocol is needed, the study team should begin the process prior to submitting the DTUA in RAMP.
Information on requesting a change to an IRB protocol can be found here. Additional guidance on sending and receiving individual level human subjects research data can be found here (for sending) and here (for receiving).
Use this DUA to transfer limited data sets and the FDP template cannot be used.
File: Data-Use-Agreement-for-Disclosure-of-LDS.pdfThis is the FDP DTUA template modified for use in a multiparty collaboration.
File: DTUA-2020-FDP_Collaborative_DTUA.docxUse this template when sharing de-identified data derived from human subjects.
File: DTUA-2020-De-IdentifiedData.pdfYou will often need to work with the UW purchasing department to help you acquire software, services, or materials for your research. These agreements are processed through Shop UW+ and signed by representatives from Purchasing Services.
KEY POINTS
Department Finance Team sets up requisition.
Include any agreement attached to the purchase.
Additional reviews for data and sample sharing might be necessary.
The close connection between your research and these software, services, or materials often means that there will be specific research related terms. For example, if you are sharing data with the vendor, you will want to make sure there are appropriate data use provisions covering how the vendor may use your data. If you are acquiring Business Associate Services, you will need to ensure a Business Associate Agreement is signed.
Research purchases are often considered sole source acquisitions. Thus, you should be prepared to submit a sole source justification as part of your requisition.
Your Department’s finance team will help you with creating the requisition in Shop UW+. The Contracts Team will help you determine what additional agreements, terms, or additional reviews may be necessary to ensure compliance with University Policy.
The SMPH DUA intake tool greatly reduces the time needed to prepare your outgoing datasets for sharing. The tool consists of two parts. The first is a forward-facing Qualtrics Survey that gathers information about your project. The second is a back-end management program used by the Contracts Team to quickly assess your needs, gather additional information when necessary, and track the project through completion. The tool can be used for any SMPH project that includes a data sharing component.
The tool is not a replacement for the RAMP record; the DUA tool streamlines the SMPH review, while RAMP manages the RSP component.
The Qualtrics Survey guides you through a series of questions about your project, your dataset, and your proposed sharing. After you complete the Survey, a series of targeted tickets are created to alert the involved parties (such as IT or the Privacy Officer) that your request has been entered and you are in need of assistance. This ensures that the various reviews necessary before datasets can be shared occur simultaneously rather than consecutively.
Before beginning the Survey, it is important to have the following items handy for upload when applicable:
The Survey can be accessed by clicking the button below.
